Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
liz | "Yes! sounds great! I think we are trying to have that kind of language, could you try adding that to the top paragraph of https://publiclab.org/wik..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
pdhixenbaugh | "What about having a title and subtitle for some of these pages? To provide context and other recognizable titles. E.g.: something like but not nec..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
warren | "Replication is a pretty big topic -- i put down some notes from a discussion we had among staff yesterday in this GitHub issue, looking forward to ..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
gretchengehrke | "@wmacfarl, I completely agree with you there. Thanks for highlighting that. I also think that we need to provide more feedback options than "succe..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
liz | "@wmacfarl this is really, really helpful. 1) we're working on how to document fails this week! We'll keep you posted. 2) Is there a good example ..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
wmacfarl | "@warren, @liz -- I mentioned this at #leaffest-2016 but wanted to put it here as well. I think that "common pitfalls" or "troubleshooting" or some..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
warren | "@liz -- are you really against our making an activity guide for how to write a good activity? " | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
warren | "At #leaffest-2016 we made a LOT of progress on activities! I noticed @kgradow compiled lots of existing #Coqui content into a grid at https://publi..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
warren | "We've been starting to work on a template, too! ## Goals Why you'd want to try this, what it accomplishes ## Activities to do first * link to ..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
warren | "Ah! another -- "how many people are needed, or can do it together?" " | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
warren | "@cfastie says: "common pitfalls" (at #leaffest)! Great idea. " | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
dhaffnersr | "@david-days @stoft,@warren, Point 4 correction: 4) Plab's "progress toward community pollution analysis"; -profile view: audit of data by self-per..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
dhaffnersr | "@david-days @stoft,@warren, I agree that sometimes, "peer" review can be a bit like, trying to sprint through a pool of molasses, although this is ..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
stoft | "At the risk of missing his points, it sounds like @david-days is suggesting PLab might be described by (no particular order or emphasis) 1) enviro..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
david-days | "I'm going to jump again in as a contrarian, but with a purpose (hopefully it will help). My intent is to step lightly, but I may step on everyone'..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
stoft | "I'd agree with @gretchengehrke that building awareness of what information data contains, and what information it does not contain, is of primary i..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
gretchengehrke | "Hi folks, I totally agree with @stoft that it is essential to understand the limitations of any data before trying to present them as evidence (my ..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
dhaffnersr | "I will no longer be posting my research here at Plab, now or in the future, my reasons are simple, I work very hard at what I do and what I am tryi..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
dhaffnersr | "@warren, @stoft, no, your point was not missed, a ruler measurement of notation such as 2.034685 would be irrelevant, since 4685 would be quite dif..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
stoft | "@warren, et. al. Seems my point was missed; this is not a trivial point and it isn't just a matter of scientific notation where measurements are co..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
dhaffnersr | "@warren, @stoft, @david-days, Hmmm...seems like there are instances where 2.0 is appropriate; "Typically, scientific notation is used for this pur..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
stoft | "@warren, @david-days is right; and in a number of different ways. Yes, the "integrity" of the data is an accurate reference; both legal and scienti..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
dhaffnersr | "@david-days, Thanks for your reply, I appreciate it, and I look forward to you next response! Dave H " | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
david-days | "@dhaffnersr, I would be happy to help in any way I can. I will try to post something on your recent work this weekend if I can. In the meantime,..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago |