| Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| funnyjokes | " The article you have shared here very good. This is really interesting information for me. Thanks for sharing! webnovel " | Read more » | over 5 years ago | |||
| liz | "Check out this Reddit AMA about the "Free The Science" initiative: https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/58gbl0/science_ama_series_were_prof_ge..." | Read more » | over 7 years ago | |||
| liz | "Here's a link to a journal article from @philipsilva: Introduction This paper will provide an historical description of the development of the sc..." | Read more » | over 7 years ago | |||
| liz | "Reposting resources that OpenAIRE sent out last week: For this last day of Peer Review week, OpenAIRE is releasing a new report detailing three ex..." | Read more » | over 7 years ago | |||
| stoft | "I like your approach and like keeping the top-level choice up front. I'm also thinking that perhaps there should be a pre-defined list of categorie..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| gretchengehrke | "Hi folks, I'm late to this comment thread, but am really excited about it. I generally want to support and echo many of @stoft's comments, particul..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "@Warren's thought about 'publishing assistance' is a good one and one which inherantly contains a filter mechanism. Orthogonal to a list of topic-b..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| warren | "However, science (ideally) is not about feelings I just wanted to clarify that the goal of encouraging new contributors is not in order to preserv..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| david-days | "@viechdokter, I would put in @stoft and @cfastie's description as an additional process, which makes it immediately backwards compatible. By "add..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "@viechdokter, perhaps even here, terminology can be problematic. Example: 'Ranking'. There really are many interpretations and implications of the ..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| viechdokter | "@stoft: I support the idea of a review committee. Not for ranking but for advice. Makes much more sense in promoting the quality stuff and in advis..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| viechdokter | "I still wonder... if the little boy coincidentally meets Sir Newton in the garden and asks about the apple and the moon he might just get an answer..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "I agree with @cfastie that such a process should encourage contributors to improve upon documenting their work and I think "PLab" can play a leadin..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| cfastie | "@stoft’s concerns about the effectiveness of a crowd-based and rule-based ranking system are probably justified because the active publiclab commun..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| cfastie | "I had not considered legacy research notes, but I have a different view of them. Implementing some form of review has two main consequences: it sep..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| david-days | "@stoft--I think that is a very good summary of the articles that @liz and @warren posted as references. It is also a good reason to at least try t..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "Hmmm, my guess is that a realistic system for scientific material from such diverse sources cannot simply rely on a set of automated rules and sear..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| david-days | "Well, if you look at the math that would support it, it actually becomes a bit more nuanced. (We can always adjust). However, let's suppose that w..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "@cfaste does have some good points; clear rank topics, finite review period and minimum rank numbers in some form. I'd also agree that pitfalls are..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| cfastie | "That's very clever that users with good reputations can counteract unscrupulous newbies gaming the system for their buds. It would be cool if users..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| david-days | "I think that @cfastie has a good point...or set of points. One slight modification would be to put weights on the users and rankings. A combinati..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| cfastie | "Here is a proposal which might reconcile a few of the ideas presented here including: @stoft’s great idea of using a checklist to determine if a ..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "@viechdokter, no problem; it's a community of friends. I've written enough code to understand the value of diverse data; algorithms can only be as ..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| david-days | "@stoft, my apologies for misinterpreting your comment. From a software perspective, having an additional/parallel process to review (and "mark", ..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago |