| Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| stoft | "Jeff, I did a few quick tests and added an "Opacity" section above. While more observations are needed, these limited results are interesting. " | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| stoft | "Thanks; good comments. 1 - Dilution: I updated the note to clarify that the larger signals were only attenuated to better match the range of the w..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| warren | "I especially appreciated your introduction of a "false positive" of laundry detergent here; excellently displayed too. In your first two conclusio..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| warren | "There is a LOT in this post; first, thank you Dave for a very thorough analysis! I'm sure I'll have more to add, but to start with, a clarificatio..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| eustatic | "wow " | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| stoft | "Gretchen, thanks for the insight. I'd read that the generally broad fluorescence spectrum is, as would be expected, a combination of many spectral..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| gretchengehrke | "This is a really great post, Dave! As for the concentration effects, in addition to quenching, there is also shielding, and there can be another p..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| stoft | "I just ran some new calculations looking at the curves from my existing data and found a possible correlation between oil density and the centroid ..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| stoft | "Jeff, thanks. 1 - Yes, you are right, there is a "glow" from EVO. However, that peak is small and out at 650nm past where it has little effect. I ..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| warren | " "visually differentiate between the five (5) test samples" - here, you mean based on qualitative visual inspection of the graphs, right? Do you be..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| warren | "This is super, and very impressive, Dave. I have a number of comments/questions, but I'll start with just a few: I'm very surprised to hear that ..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| stevie | "In a set, the beta program has people to post the "sets" in a research note. I smoothed the individual scans and compiled them as a set and posted ..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| warren | "Oh, but are these in a set, or individual? Maybe auto-smooth is not working in the old sets viewer only when viewing spectra individually? " | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| stevie | "It's the "auto smooth 10 rows below" button right? here are the two graphs:: Smoothed:: Not Smoothed: " | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| warren | "Oh, interesting. Can you make a set which compares smoothed vs. non-smoothed? In my tests, it reduced noise/spikiness, which helped discourage me f..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| stevie | "Another question I had was why we "auto smooth" each sample. I saw no difference from when I did this on my sample sets from when it wasn't done (I..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| warren | "It only reads the top line of the image; this is documented but not as clearly as it should be. I just added this line to the display to help clari..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| stevie | "the "20w50 A" was my first scan. Might have taken me a bit to get these consistent, but I'm not really sure why it was so different. I equalized th..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| warren | "Wow, your scans look really awesome and consistent! the 20x50 less so, but still good. Why do you think the 20w50 varied more? Are all of those are..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago |