Bringing this question in from @sarasage
"I know a bit of Arduino and electronics and am looking to prototype low-cost, low-power VOC detectors over the summer for our community.
A link to the adafruit sensor: https://store.digilentinc.com/pmod-aqs-digital-gas-sensor-for-air-quality/ "
More specifically, does anyone have experience with VOC breakout boards for Arduino?
Do you prefer a different manufacturer?
Do you have experience using AQ Arduino devices in the field?
Thanks! Sara
Is this a question? Click here to post it to the Questions page.
Reply to this comment...
Log in to comment
interested in this for sure
Same!
Reply to this comment...
Log in to comment
The Adafruit VOC sensor module uses a CCS-811 VOC sensor. Modules with these sensors cost about half as much when purchased on eBay from sellers in Asia.
These modules seem to produce meaningful results. My experience with them is limited (only two research notes: https://publiclab.org/tag/ccs811-gas-sensor/author/cfastie).
Chris
Reply to this comment...
Log in to comment
Here is some new data from a gas sensor. This is a module with a CCS-811 sensor (provides an estimate of total volatile organic compounds [VOC]). These modules cost about $10 on eBay. I had two of these running for four weeks in my office on separate data loggers. Both sensors recorded similar variation in total VOC (Figure 1). This suggests that whatever is being measured is being measured somewhat consistently.
Figure 1. Four weeks of data from two CCS-811 VOC sensors in my office. The two sensors were a few inches apart. Each dot is the mean of 60 sensor measurements taken once per second and saved once per minute.
Both of the data loggers also recorded data from a Plantower PMS7003 particulate matter sensor (similar to the sensor in a PurpleAir sensor). Having results from these two sensors together helps immensely when interpreting the results of either. Although I recorded what was happening everyday in the room where the sensors were, it was not always obvious what the sensors were responding to. Lots of activities in the room produced particulates and gases including soldering, 3D printing, room heater with a fan, and human body stuff. Some of these activities produced only particulates, some only gas, and some both (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Four weeks of data from a CCS-811 VOC sensor and a Plantower PMS7003 particulate sensor. The two sensors were two inches apart. Each dot is the mean of 60 sensor measurements taken once per second and saved once per minute.
If I really wanted to have the best chance of interpreting what type of air pollution was being recorded, I would also add a temperature and humidity sensor. I would also keep a detailed log of what was happening near the sensors.
Is this a question? Click here to post it to the Questions page.
Ooh interesting. Yeah could imagine interesting things related to, say, cleaning products, gas stoves, even paints or dry but treated surfaces... plywood, carpets, all possibly producing VOCs. I guess this calls for some kind of complex but repeatable dance routine to sequence a bunch of interactions with these materials.
Thank you so much for posting this! I purchased a couple of VOC detectors over the last week and wanted to know how the off-brand VOC detectors fare in accuracy and your response is so very helpful.
When I have used portable, industrial VOC meters (ppb) in the past, I doubled up instruments because since there is a loss of accuracy the further one goes without calibration (using gas canisters). It seems that 2-monthly calibration worked best when those instruments were in regular use. Is it correct to assume that the Adafruit and other CCS-811 VOC sensors do not need regular calibration or initial calibration, as they use a different technique and not laser-scattering?
Is this a question? Click here to post it to the Questions page.
`>> CCS-811 VOC sensors do not need regular calibration or initial calibration, as they use a different technique and not laser-scattering?
The CCS-811 sensor uses a very clever but crude technique to estimate the concentration of VOCs in air. A tiny heated metal plate is exposed to the air. The resistance of the plate changes when certain types of molecules contact (or are near?) the plate. The resistance is monitored and translated into a ballpark value for the concentration of VOCs.
There is no provision made for calibrating these sensors. However, if you have simultaneous data from a CCS-811 and more reliable sensor, you can adjust the results of the CCS-811 (in the Arduino sketch or afterwards). In general, these sensors will allow you to see how VOC is changing over time or in response to events. The absolute values for VOC will not have much meaning (i.e., they won't stand up in court).
More important than calibration might be adjustment for changing temperature and humidity. The standard libraries for some CCS-811 products allow the temperature and humidity to be automatically entered into the calculation of the VOC result. A $2.00 sensor (e.g. BME280) can be added and temperature and humidity data can be used in real time to get better VOC results. Some CCS-811 modules incorporate a BME280 and do this compensation by default. There are also single sensors which measure VOC, temperature, and humidity (e.g., BME680).
There are some good resources about VOC sensors including:
A few things to consider:
Chris
Is this a question? Click here to post it to the Questions page.
Reply to this comment...
Log in to comment