There are approximately 2.4 million miles of **pipelines** within the United States, crossing through every state in the nation [(As illustrated on this map)](https://pipeline101.org/Where-Are-Pipelines-Located). The majority are concentrated along the Gulf Coast, where an abundance of natural resources, tax incentives, and loose regulation has supported the proliferation of the oil and gas industry within the region over the past 60 + years. Massive environmental engineering was required in order to create this network of pipelines, and in turn there have been negative impacts to natural land building processes that once supported the growth of the Mississippi Delta. Additionally, the presence of so many pipelines has exponentially increased the chances of oil spills, noxious odors, contaminated air and polluted water impacting the health and safety of residents. This page is a resource guide for those who are looking to conduct research, collect data, or submit reports of environmental concerns regarding pipelines. Although a majority of the work here is based within Louisiana and other Gulf states, the tools and techniques described here can be adapted for use in any geographic region. If you are working with pipelines in an area other than the Gulf Coast, please tag your work with #pipeline so that it will appear on this page! [wikis:parent:pipeline] **** ##Notes [notes:pipeline] ## Questions [questions:pipeline] ...
Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MaggPi | "Thx Alahna for the post! I downloaded some Mar 20th New Orleans satellite imagery and posted to mapknitter. [ https://mapknitter.org/maps/satell..." | Read more » | almost 6 years ago | |||
stevie | " Great post Alahna!! So much information. The part about good photos is really helpful! " | Read more » | almost 6 years ago | |||
eustatic | "I owe Matej samples. Stevie gave me some brown jars, so i can divide the bulk samples and mail them to him. then, we can zap them independently! S " | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
warren | "Tar Balls over time? Scott, I'd be really interested if you collected a set of a bunch of different tar ball spectra, esp. in different states of ..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
liz | "Fantastic and entertaining write-up @eustatic -- thanks all! " | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
warren | "I added your #1 spectra from each type to a set: https://spectralworkbench.org/sets/show2/2945 Then equalized height to compare. Which do you thin..." | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
warren | "Wow, very clear! Just to link back, here is Diana's profile on Spectral Workbench: https://spectralworkbench.org/profile/DFlores6073 Diana - i see..." | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
stevie | "In a set, the beta program has people to post the "sets" in a research note. I smoothed the individual scans and compiled them as a set and posted ..." | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
warren | "Oh, but are these in a set, or individual? Maybe auto-smooth is not working in the old sets viewer only when viewing spectra individually? " | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
stevie | "It's the "auto smooth 10 rows below" button right? here are the two graphs:: Smoothed:: Not Smoothed: " | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
warren | "Oh, interesting. Can you make a set which compares smoothed vs. non-smoothed? In my tests, it reduced noise/spikiness, which helped discourage me f..." | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
stevie | "Another question I had was why we "auto smooth" each sample. I saw no difference from when I did this on my sample sets from when it wasn't done (I..." | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
warren | "It only reads the top line of the image; this is documented but not as clearly as it should be. I just added this line to the display to help clari..." | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
stevie | "the "20w50 A" was my first scan. Might have taken me a bit to get these consistent, but I'm not really sure why it was so different. I equalized th..." | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
warren | "Wow, your scans look really awesome and consistent! the 20x50 less so, but still good. Why do you think the 20w50 varied more? Are all of those are..." | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
warren | "I loved learning about this at the Barnraising and it's great to read the in-depth report-back too, thanks Stevie! " | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
warren | "Oh man... we ought to get in touch with john again ... we could definitely put together a little group to get out there 3 or 4 times... " | Read more » | over 13 years ago |