The Infragram project brings together a range of different efforts to make Do-It-Yourself plant health comparisons possible with infrared photography. Use the web-based app at [Infragram.org](https://infragram.org/) to process your imagery. This project was made possible with support from Google and the [AREN Project at NASA](https://www.globe.gov/web/aren-project/). ## Uses Vineyards, large farms, and NASA all use near-infrared photography for assessment, usually by mounting expensive sensors on airplanes and satellites. Infrared analysis is used for a variety of things, but most focus on assessing plant health, such as: * to assess crops and the efficacy of #agriculture practices * better #soil management (reducing #fertilizer, soil treatments) * in #wetlands analysis [![Screenshot_2017-10-18_at_11.59.57_AM.png](https://publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/021/972/large/Screenshot_2017-10-18_at_11.59.57_AM.png)](https://publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/021/972/original/Screenshot_2017-10-18_at_11.59.57_AM.png) Just as cell phone video has become instrumental in accountability today, we aim to democratize and improve reporting about environmental impacts. **** ## Getting started To start to do your own infrared analysis project, you'll need: 1. **[Photos](#Getting+images)**: A way to take near-infrared photos AND matching regular visible light photos from the same angle (in a single camera or two matched cameras) 2. [A **question** you'd like to answer](#Study+design) -- look through these templates for how to design your analysis 3. **[Software](#Software)** for processing and analysing your photos 4. **[Analysis](#Analysis)** -- tips and support to interpret and understand what your images are telling you To get a kit with this already set up on an SD card and/or Raspberry Pi camera, see: * [Infragram Pi Camera Kit](https://store.publiclab.org/products/infragram-pi-camera) * [Pre-flashed SD cards for Raspberry Pi cameras](https://store.publiclab.org/products/pi-builder-cards) [notes:grid:activity:pi-camera-setup] **** ## How it works ### Background In 2014, we launched an early version of this project on Kickstarter, and the video is a good overview of the project, although we've come a long way since: _The [Infragram Kickstarter](https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/publiclab/infragram-the-infrared-photography-project) video, a great introduction to the project._ **** [![68747470733a2f2f7075626c69636c61622e6f72672f73797374656d2f696d616765732f70686f746f732f3030302f3034352f3436382f6c617267652f72676e2d73706c69742e706e67.png](/i/45512)](/i/45512?s=o) ## Infragram starter kits The [Public Lab Store](http://store.publiclab.org) offers a range of Do-It-Yourself kits to convert cameras for infrared photography, as well as ready-made cameras like the [Infragram Point & Shoot camera](/wiki/infragram-point-shoot): > [Get a kit to start](https://store.publiclab.org/collections/diy-infrared-photography) Also see [Getting images](#Getting+images), below. **** ## Getting images To start, you'll need **near-infrared images** and regular **visible light images** of the same scene -- or an image which combines these in different color channels. See the below White Balance section for example images. There are sources of #remote-sensing imagery from satellites and planes you can use, but the Infragram project is about making and using low-cost converted cameras to take our own images. There are both **single camera** and **dual camera** ways of doing this, and each has pros and cons. [Get a kit here](https://store.publiclab.org/collections/diy-infrared-photography) or learn about converting a camera here: > [Infrared Camera Conversion](/wiki/infrared-camera-conversion) **** ### White balance We've learned that careful white balancing of your converted Infragram camera is essential for good NDVI images. Learn how [in this short video](/notes/warren/08-15-2013/white-balancing-a-canon-camera-for-infragram-photography) and [read in depth on the topic in research by Chris Fastie](/notes/cfastie/06-17-2013/white-balance). There is also a wiki page on the subject at http://publiclab.org/wiki/infrablue-white-balance Here are samples of well-white-balanced images: _Left: pale blue from a RED filter; Right: pale yellow from a BLUE filter. Images by @mathew and [Eclectis students](https://publiclab.org/n/9372)_ [![](/system/images/photos/000/018/533/thumb/Rosco_26_filtered.JPG)(/system/images/photos/000/018/533/original/Rosco_26_filtered.JPG) [![](https://i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/001/647/thumb/IMG_0025.JPG)](https://i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/001/647/original/IMG_0025.JPG) If you're using an [Infragram Point & Shoot](/wiki/infragram-point-shoot) (aka Mobius Action Cam), see [this page for a guide on setting the white balance of that camera](/wiki/infragram-point-shoot#Activities). [![Screen_Shot_2022-03-15_at_12.24.43_PM.png](/i/45515)](/i/45515?s=o) **** ### Filters _Should you use a **RED** or **BLUE** filter?_ See [Infragram filters](/wiki/infragram-filters) for more on different filters and how well they work. Early research by Public Lab contributors led to a blue filter technique for making Infragram cameras. But recent research on PublicLab.org has shown that red filters work better -- and on a wider range of cameras. Blue filters did not work on most CMOS cameras, especially cheaper webcams. Public Lab kits now ship with the red **Rosco #19 "Fire" filter**. **** ## Conversion types There are three major ways to produce multispectral "infragram" images: * Two-camera - one near-infrared camera and one normal RGB camera * Single camera w/ red filter - replacing blue with infrared * Single camera w/ blue filter - replacing red with infrared Since these are a hard to keep track of, here's a diagram to show the three main types (you can [edit the diagram here](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hIR68D9sW16_A2eYAi4QJCrWagG4j89BTB7m15Ubom4/edit#slide=id.g3cb9c89f54_0_0)): [![infragram-types.png](/i/25365)](/i/25365) **** ### Comparing plant health An important limitation of most DIY techniques is that we are using uncalibrated cameras, and so the analysis works best when we compare two vegetated areas under the same conditions (light, angle, time of day) rather than just take a photo of a single region. That is, the DIY approach is based on relative, or comparative, uses -- you can't learn a lot without a point of comparison. [questions:ndvi-comparison] An easy way to do a comparison is: 1. compare two areas (with the same type of plants) within a single photograph 2. compare two photographs with the same camera settings and lighting conditions (angle, brightness, color), of the same plants [illustration] Learn more at [Comparing Plant Health](/wiki/comparing-plant-health) **** ## Software Doing [NDVI analysis](/wiki/ndvi) on plants requires post-processing both infrared and visible images (or a combined image -- see [Getting images](#Getting+images)) into a composite image, using the NDVI equation (or another like it). This can be done with a variety of software; see this page for more: > [Infrared software](/wiki/infrared-software) **** ## Questions Post questions or troubleshooting requests here, for example about: * making sure your camera is working (color balance, exposure, light source) * what to compare against (see study design) * different lighting conditions or angles [questions:infragram] **** ## Activities [activities:infragram] **** ## Challenges We're working to refine and improve DIY infrared photography on a number of fronts; here, take a look at the leading challenges we're hoping to solve, and post your own. For now, we're using the Q&A feature, so just click "Ask a question" to post your own challenge. Be sure to add: * constraints: expense, complexity * goals: performance, use cases [questions:infragram-challenges] **** ## Give or get help Here are some resources to get help converting or using your Infragram camera. Keep in mind that we are a peer driven community and we encourage everyone to give as well as receive assistance and support! [questions:infragram] When describing your question or answer, please include details of the equipment and process you are using [as described here for Infragram photos](http://publiclab.org/notes/cfastie/07-17-2013/infrablue-minutiae) . Also see our older FAQ here: https://publiclab.org/wiki/infragram-faq **** ![dorn](https://i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/000/342/medium/dorn) ![kites](https://i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/000/343/medium/kites) DIY Filter Pack: This is just a piece of "superblue" filter which you can use to turn your webcam or cheap point-and-shoot into an infrared camera. The filter allows you to take an infrared photo in the "red" channel of your camera, and a visible image in the "blue" channel. The Public Lab kit comes with a white balance card and instructions on how install your filter -- it's pretty easy! Infragram Point & Shoot: This is a straightforward, if basic, point-and-shoot camera which we're getting a factory to pre-convert with infrablue filters: you can simply take photos as you normally would, then upload them to our free and open-source web app to quickly and easily get a variety of composite images and analyses (the site is currently in beta with minimal initial features). **** _"We're excited that Public Laboratory is developing a low-cost infrared camera which will help us **track the success of wetland restoration projects in the Gulf Region--as well as help us track pollution.** The Gulf Restoration Network has been using the aerial monitoring techniques that Public Lab developed, so having the infrared camera available to put on the balloon and kite rig will only expand the applications of that technology as well as add value to airplane monitoring flights that help us watchdog the oil industry in the Gulf."_ -- [Scott Eustis](http://publiclab.org/profile/eustatic), M.S., Gulf Restoration Network ### More information The Public Lab community has been building up a knowledge base in DIY infrared imaging for years. Read more about the [history of this project here](http://publiclab.org/wiki/near-infrared-camera-history) ![dual](https://s3.amazonaws.com/ksr/assets/000/581/547/defb8db0662fd4b54a515b7457a89976_large.png?1368219190) ![melange](https://s3.amazonaws.com/ksr/assets/000/581/552/6aa9b7a67ec720c4b8b3388b5582891e_large.png?1368219243) **** ### Infragram instructions and graphics _Digital files for the filter pack envelope (including logo) and instructions:_ infrablue-filter-envelope-color.pdf infragram-instructions-0.3.pdf infragram-instructions-back-0.2.pdf _Sketchup model for the "filter switch" graphic:_ filter-switch.skp ### Datasheets Datasheet for Infragram Webcam: infragram-webcam-new-old-diagram.pdf Focal length of the camera:3.27mm. Chip sensor size for the camera: Sensor:ov2643,SIZE:1/4" Spec_of_JDEPC-OV04_Ver_1.01.pdf Module_XJD__OEM_-_final_version_-_July_30-2013.xlsx HK-7035AS-582-2-M7_Model_(95955).pdf...
Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Claytonb | "Here is a similar scene with the Event38 at about the same height. This is with f/4, exp 1/1250, ISO 100 " | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
Claytonb | "@bortek -I am assuming that the noise is partly due to the filter thickness and light requirement. I believe the Event38 filter is 0.5mm thick and ..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
bortek | "This is really interesting. I have read Ned's article too and it is clearly better contrast when using red filter versus blue. I have just receive..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
Parth | "Hi Chris, I replaced IR filter with rosco fire filter#19 in OV5642 camera module to replicate infragram‘s point & shoot camera.I captured imag..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
cfastie | "Hi Parth, The three methods of computing NDVI all do the same thing. They do the same math (NIR-VIS)/(NIR+VIS) on each pixel. They are equally rel..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
Parth | "Hi Chris, Yes ,they are the castor beans. I converted previously discussed image into NDVI image using infragram 's web server utilities. usin..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
cfastie | "The NDVI image looks good. Are they castor beans? The plants have higher NDVI values than soil or sky, but within the plants, variation in NDVI is ..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
Parth | "Hi Chris, I captured the images using the infra gram's point & shoot camera.I converted these captured images into NDVI image using python scr..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
cfastie | "Parth, The dual band dichroic filters are very expensive and seem to work best if installed inside the camera. They should provide better results ..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
Claytonb | "@Thorsten - you are correct the images were mislabeled. Thanks for the heads up. I have corrected the labels. Thanks again, Clayton " | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
Thorsten | "@Claytonb, thanks for the test. I assume the images are correct but the channels in the image captions are somehow mixed up. I guess it should be: ..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
Parth | "Hi Chris, Thank you very much for elaborate me more about filter and also for clear up my confusion. I read your research note regard the Dual ba..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
cfastie | "Parth, Good question. You might think that digital cameras were good examples of intelligent design, but they are more like living organisms which..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
Parth | "Hi Chris, Thanks for your quick response. I am little confusing with the NIR light bandwidth because of NIR light's band width is 700 to 900 nm a..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
cfastie | "Parth, Red filters like the Rosco #19 block most blue and green light, so the blue and green channels cannot receive the colors that they would no..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
Parth | "Hi Chris, Thanks for your response. I read the data sheet of rosco fire filter #19 and i think this filter is block blue and green light upto 550..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
cfastie | "Okay, looks good. You just have to put carriage returns or two spaces after a line or an image to make it insert a return. " | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
Claytonb | "The filter size I have in the Canon S100's are 8.9 X 7.9 X 1. The sensor screws are each backed out approximately 3/4 turn from the factory positio..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
Claytonb | "@cfastie Apologies Chris I had to fix the image layout and labels and couldn't edit right so I'm reposting.These are from the MidOpt DB 475/850 and..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
cfastie | "Wow, the 660/850 camera focuses well across the image. That's good to know it can be done with a 1.0 mm thick filter. The 475/850 camera looks a li..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
cfastie | "Hi @Claytonb, That's good to know. Did you compare the different channels to see if some showed any vignetting? A photo of an evenly lit solid fie..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
cfastie | "Parth, Most photos taken by DIY NDVI cameras cannot be converted directly to NDVI because the ratio of the visible and NIR values does not compute..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
Parth | "Hi Chris, Thank you very much for kind response. I converted various plant's images into NDVI index as per your suggestion for infragram standard..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
cfastie | "Hi Parth, There are a lot of options at infragram.org, so it's not easy to find the most sensible way to process a photo. I made the NDVI image be..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago |