why the diffraction grating should be placed at 65° and the camera should be placed at 45°? What ...
Public Lab is an open community which collaboratively develops accessible, open source, Do-It-Yourself technologies for investigating local environmental health and justice issues.
All topics »
If you cannot use the ReCaptcha to verify you are not a bot, use this alternative verification.
As an open source community, we believe in open licensing of content so that other members of the community can leverage your work legally -- with attribution, of course. By joining the Public Lab site, you agree to release the content you post here under a Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike license, and the hardware designs you post under the CERN Open Hardware License 1.1 (full text). This has the added benefit that others must share their improvements in turn with you.
sign up to join the Public Lab community
Forgot your password? Reset it here
by obisidian |
July 17, 2017 13:45 |
why the diffraction grating should be placed at 65° and the camera should be placed at 45°? What is the advantage of this placement?
IMHO, the 2-angle configuration was simply derived through mechanical tinkering. It seemed to work and so was subsequently measured and documented -- but history tends to live on.. Since the DVD-grating spectra tend to use only a portion of the camera's image "pixel width", there is some "flexibility" in the configuration which will still show a spectrum.
The downside is the asymmetry at the sensor which adds non-linearity to the spectral wavelength - to - pixel relationship so the 2-angle configuration is less than ideal. IMHO, the grating should be parallel to the camera sensor plane and generally within a couple mm of the lens. Such an assembly is then mounted at 45-deg to the incident light. For some graphical explanations see: https://publiclab.org/notes/stoft/03-02-2015/plab-3-spectrometer-upgrade-prototype .
Hope this helps.
Reply to this comment...
Log in to comment