Comments

Author Comment Last activity Moderation
stoft "@Warren, thanks for the suggestions. Take a look (above) at the two new plots which replace the one(s) you referenced. You're right, the new ones m..." | Read more » about 8 years ago
stoft "Or, they are all 'bad' (noisy) to some degree ;-) The sharpness of the peak is still mostly a factor of slit, mechanical rigidity, being light-tigh..." | Read more » about 8 years ago
stoft "Actually, you need several additional pieces for SWB: 1) average 3-5 parallel lines, 2) monitor stability and take data until it IS stable or times..." | Read more » about 8 years ago
stoft "Ideally, the user would select a "stable" ('smooth' or 'broad peak') region to monitor and then the software would take samples (and average) while..." | Read more » about 8 years ago
stoft "Yes, I'd agree that time averaging would help and, if possible, it sould be the default to reduce this noise component. I do not have 30 fps data, ..." | Read more » about 8 years ago
stoft "Yes, the flexibility is good and yes, that plot is better because it doesn't alter what is real and clearly shows the effect of just cutting off th..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
stoft "Ah yes, the new plots are there. However, the entire shape of the spectra has been shifted so the ratios between peaks are thus different from the ..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
stoft "I'm confused by the two plots. The 'noisy' plot doesn't have the signal so I'm guessing it's an average of what is left after chopping off anything..." | Read more » over 8 years ago