| Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| donblair | "Hi @gretchengehrke! Sorry for the much-delayed reply :) and thanks for the comment. I, too, liked this approach -- basically, using the differenc..." | Read more » | about 7 years ago | |||
| donblair | "Oh gosh -- Chris, thanks for tagging me in this thread -- I had no idea that this existed! Wow, Ed -- what amazing work you've been doing!! It's ..." | Read more » | almost 9 years ago | |||
| donblair | "Yes, nice! In the picture, it looks like one could place a little cuvette right there in the middle and assess the turbidity :) " | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
| donblair | "Also: how hard would it be to rig up some sort of 'pen' that connects to a 555 and writes out a 'record' of the conductivity on some physical mediu..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
| donblair | "ZOMG that's brilliant. I'm going to try to bring the materials required to do a rough prototype of this to Plymouth -- but anyway shouldn't be hard..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
| donblair | "E.g. I just found this: http://wiki.openmusiclabs.com/wiki/PWMDAC And, oh gosh, this is fun: http://sensorium.github.io/Mozzi/ And: http://www.ucho..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
| donblair | "Good call on the power control chip -- for the riffle-ito design, I'm just using an LDO, which should provide a relatively clean signal? But yeah,..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
| donblair | "Egads! Mat, thanks for pointing this out! I totally flubbed that one: in the 555 approach, the signal that is passing through the water is indee..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
| donblair | "Ah -- great thoughts! And your comment points to an important issue, which is that I myself was unclear (and still am, a bit) as to the utility of..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago |