There are a few different methods being tested out for detecting hydrogen sulfide, and given that it's toxic, how can we validate these as part of our process of developing & refining them?
Read more: https://publiclab.org/wiki/hydrogen-sulfide
I suspect there's a lot of ideas and clues buried in this research from over the years: #hydrogen-sulfide
I'd guess we need a known source of H2S -- and a safe way to interact with it.
I see a couple leads here, one by @jschaffr :
@JSummers especially has thought through the disposal question a good bit, happily.
@sophie also had a post up on using a flame hood for protection -- i think this one: https://publiclab.org/notes/sophie/07-16-2014/sensing-hydrogen-sulfide-from-cafo-emissions-in-poweshiek-county-iowa
I know that test didn't seem to have worked out, but based on what Sophie wrote, I think there may be some good ways to build on that as a framework for validation:
Reply to this comment...
Log in to comment
Also, not that this sounds ideal, but these two students did some good documentation and work on detecting h2s from bodily sources, so to speak: https://publiclab.org/notes/warren/9-6-2011/hydrogen-sulfide-detection-fart-detector
Reply to this comment...
Log in to comment
And @sara noted these glove bags for working with toxic materials: https://publiclab.org/notes/sara/2-6-2012/hydrogen-sulfide-testing-glove-bag
Reply to this comment...
Log in to comment
For what it's worth, you can buy H2S gas here for $189, but I think I'd think twice about doing so given how toxic it is: https://www.durawear.com/msa-10153844-econo-cal-calibration-gas-34-liter-20-ppm-h2s-smart-rfid-ring-for-gx2-smart-cylinder-holder/
Reply to this comment...
Log in to comment