Particulate matter (PM) is airborne particles and droplets, that can be inhaled. Some PM is formed through physical motion, like pulverized dust getting wind swept, and other PM is formed through gaseous chemical reactions in the atmosphere. Particulate matter is [regulated](/wiki/pm-monitoring-regulations) because it has negative health consequences, especially when it is small enough to travel deep into the lungs, and be [respired.](https://publiclab.org/wiki/pm#Respirable+Particles) ####Pages in this research area: [Questions and notes shared on PM](/pm#Questions) [Understanding Particulate Matter](https://publiclab.org/wiki/pm#Background+Information) [Collecting Data on Particulate Matter](https://publiclab.org/wiki/pm-monitoring) [Choosing a PM monitoring Method - Overview](https://publiclab.org/wiki/choosing-a-method-for-particulate-matter-monitoring) In depth: - [Visual monitoring](/wiki/visual-pm)- monitoring with your eyes - [Filter-based monitoring](/wiki/filter-pm) - monitoring with lab analysis - [Optical monitoring](/wiki/optical-pm) - monitoring with sensors - [Passive monitoring](/wiki/passive-pm) - monitoring with other sample collection tools - [Sticky Pad monitoring](https://publiclab.org/notes/mathew/06-05-2014/the-development-of-stickypad-monitoring) - using tape and other materials to monitor for particulates - [Public Lab PM monitoring tool development](/wiki/pm-dev) - [Passive Monitoring tool](https://publiclab.org/wiki/SEM-stub-pm) - [Silica Monitoring](/wiki/silica-monitoring) [Regulations on PM Monitoring](https://publiclab.org/wiki/pm-monitoring-regulations) _________________________________ ###Questions [questions:pm] ###Notes [notes:pm] ###Background Information Particulate Matter (PM) is airborne dust and particle pollution that settles onto surfaces and into lungs. As a [regulated pollutant PM](/wiki/pm-monitoring-regulations) is shorthand for inhalable and respirable particulate matter, or [particulate matter that can stick in the lungs.](https://publiclab.org/wiki/pm#Respirable+Particles) Based on size alone, small airborne particles can become lodged in the lungs or even enter the bloodstream. At this size, some non-toxic materials, such as [silica](/wiki/silica), can be carcinogenic. Historically, most dust was naturally occurring, but at present natural sources of particles such as wind erosion, volcanoes, pollen, and forest fires have been overtaken by human-generated particles from combustion, roads, agriculture, construction, and mining (citation:[EPA/600/R-95/115](http://ofmpub.epa.gov/eims/eimscomm.getfile?p_download_id=4608)). [Monitoring sources of particle pollution](/wiki/pm-monitoring) and [advocating for their reduction](/wiki/frac-sand-action-oriented-resources) can have positive public health impacts. [According to the CDC](http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/showAirHIA.action), a 10% reduction in fine particles could prevent 13,000 deaths annually in the U.S. ###Airborne particles we can see [![visible-particles.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/328/medium/visible-particles.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/328/original/visible-particles.png) The smallest particles we can see with a naked eye are visible only because they diffract light to make a haze, usually with a reddish-purple tint. We cannot see haze particles directly, however, haze can be [monitored as a proxy for small particles](/wiki/visual-pm). Mold spores, lint, and household dust particles can be seen individually only when reflecting light, as in the rays coming through window into a dark room. Particles of fine sand and soil that are visible can get airborne for short periods of time. Fog are small raindrops falling slowly, and are just barely visible. Of visible particles, only haze-sized particles pose a significant health risk, [see Respirable Particles below](https://publiclab.org/wiki/pm#Respirable+Particles). ###Dust, droplets, & particle size Almost all airborne particles are either dust (solid particles broken from larger solids) or droplets (liquid particles which grow as they condense gases out of the air). A third category of nanometer-sized particles, ultrafines, are short-lived emissions from combustion. These three modes, ultrafines, droplets, and dust, are each clustered around a specific size range, such that the sizes of particles in the air are not evenly distributed. Ultrafines are short-lived, forming the center of droplets quickly. Large dust particles are also short lived, settling out. In the middle are mature droplets and fine dust that make up both the bulk of long-lived atmospheric particles and the most worrisome particles because of their [respirability](https://publiclab.org/wiki/pm#Respirable+Particles). [![CORRECTillustrative3-peak-ultradropdust.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/317/medium/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-ultradropdust.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/317/original/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-ultradropdust.png) ###Dust While some dust comes from biological sources (skin, bacteria, mold, pollen), most comes from dirt and rocks crushed small enough to get airborne. Only dust less than 10 μm can stay airborne for days, and dust less than 5 μm dust can travel for years. Larger dust settles out (called sedimentation), while smaller dust is removed by being washed away in rain or by running into objects (impaction). [![CORRECTillustrative3-peak-dust.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/318/medium/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-dust.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/318/original/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-dust.png) ###Droplets Droplets are formed as gases cool and condense. Atmospheric droplets condense from combustion gases, especially industrial and transportation emissions like sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide, and also water. Atmospheric water dominates the droplet formation process. ####Droplet Formation [![droplet-formation.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/329/medium/droplet-formation.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/329/original/droplet-formation.png) Cooling gases quickly condense into droplets in what is called the ‘accumulation mode’ of droplets. Accumulating droplets are sometimes called ‘cloud scavenging’ for the way they grow by collecting gases and mixing with other droplets. Droplets gain and lose water as the humidity changes. Condensing water often brings multiple droplets together, and this ‘wetting’ and ‘drying’ of droplets can aid in droplet accumulation. [![CORRECTillustrative3-peak-droplet.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/320/medium/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-droplet.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/320/original/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-droplet.png) [![CORRECTillustrative3-peak-droplet-humidity.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/319/medium/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-droplet-humidity.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/319/original/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-droplet-humidity.png) ####Droplets’ Beginnings: Ultrafine nulceotoids While dust can only be ground to about 0.5 μm minimum, and most dust particles are much bigger, smaller solid particles can be formed under intense heat and pressure, such as in a fire or engine. These ultrafine, or nanoparticles, are less than 0.1 μm and last only as long as their rapidly dissipating energy can keep them from bonding. With only a dozen to a few hundred molecules making up each ultrafine particle, the properties and behavior of ultrafines are poorly understood. Ultrafine material, especially elemental carbon nanoparticles from transportation and diesel, are a growing field of study. [![6.jpg](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/013/922/medium/6.jpg)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/013/922/original/6.jpg) As ultrafine particles lose energy, cooling gases condense around them, ‘nucleating’ (forming the center, or nucleus, of) a new droplet. Often the gases condensing onto ultrafines are in the same emissions stream from combustion, including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The droplets formed around ultrafines may also nucleate other droplets, especially ‘wet’ droplets of water. ###Respirable Particles The body removes objects from the lungs in two ways, by coughing (“expectorating”), or by absorption and removal by the blood stream. In order to enter the bloodstream, particles must pass the last branching passageways in the lungs: the terminal bronchioles. Particles above the terminal bronchioles are the “thoracic fraction” (thoracic means in the chest), and below the terminal bronchioles particles are considered respired particles. Respired particles may, however, still be removed by coughing. [![inhalable-respirable.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/334/medium/inhalable-respirable.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/334/original/inhalable-respirable.png) The most particles in the respiratory system average around 2.5 μm, while most in the thoracic fraction are are around 10 μm. The fate of short-lived ultrafine particles in the lungs is still being studied. [![CORRECTillustrative3-peak-respirable.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/321/medium/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-respirable.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/321/original/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-respirable.png) ###Regulation Particulate Matter is one of six ‘criteria pollutants’ determining National Ambient Air Quality Standards ([NAAQS](/wiki/frac-sand-legislation#National+Ambient+Air+Quality+Standards)). All of the EPA’s [technology-based particle regulations](https://publiclab.org/wiki/pm-monitoring-regulations#The+Federal+Reference+Methods:) share features in common with the [PM10 standard](https://publiclab.org/wiki/frac-sand-legislation#Particulate+Matter), and a deep look at the PM10 standard is illustrative. ####PM10 PM10 is the US EPA’s first attempt to capture a standardized indicator of respirable particles. “PM10” stands for Particulate Matter less than or equal to 10 μm in diameter. Established in 1987, PM10 is now a global benchmark. PM10 is a technology-based standard-- all PM10 tools and measurements are related back to the original reference [filter-based PM Monitors](/wiki/filter-pm) instrument. Similar measurement tools with a tight correlation with this original [Federal Reference Method (FRM)](https://publiclab.org/wiki/pm-monitoring-regulations#The+Federal+Reference+Methods:) now share the FRM designation. Tools that use different processes and have a somewhat less tight correlation are designated [Federal Equivalent Methods (FEMs)](/wiki/pm-monitoring-regulations#Federal+Equivalent+Methods). You can read about the FRM PM10 monitor [in the Code of Federal Regulations](https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/CFR-2012-title40-vol2/CFR-2012-title40-vol2-sec50-6/content-detail.html): [![er18jy97.022.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/332/medium/er18jy97.022.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/332/original/er18jy97.022.png) The goal of the FRM is to generate a 24 hour average of the concentration of respirable particles in the air. It does this by pumping a precise volume of air inside, selecting the particles smaller than 10 μm, and depositing them on a filter, and measuring their accumulated mass. Note that the FRM concentration is determine in "mass per volume" and not "number of particles per volume," and thus requires a gravimetric rather than a particle-counting technique. The particles are selected for size with a device called an impactor (o cyclone). The function of an FRM impactor is written into the regulation and legally defines what is and isn’t PM10. [![PM10-FRM.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/333/medium/PM10-FRM.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/333/original/PM10-FRM.png) An impactor sorts particles by momentum. As air is drawn into the instrument, an impactor plate interrupts the air’s linear flow. Light particles stay in the air stream and pass around the plate. Due to inertia, more massive particles can’t make the turn and hit the plate, thereby crashing out of the sample airstream: [![impactor.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/330/medium/impactor.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/330/original/impactor.png) The _cutoff_ size where particles either hit the plate or pass beyond it is not an absolute cutoff; there is a distribution of particle sizes that impact the plate or stay airborne. Different impactor designs are described by the 'sharpness' by which they select particles. [![cutpoint_vs_sharpness.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/326/medium/cutpoint_vs_sharpness.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/326/original/cutpoint_vs_sharpness.png) For a PM10 cutoff, 50% of particles that are 10 μm in diameter are passed by the impactor, and 50% crash. The distribution is not even, and the rate at which the impactor cuts off particles above 10 μm is the ‘sharpness’ of the cutoff. Other categories of regulation include PM2.5 and PM10-2.5, read more in [PM Monitoring Regulations](/wiki/pm-monitoring-regulations). [![CORRECTillustrative3-peak-pm10.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/322/medium/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-pm10.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/322/original/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-pm10.png) The PM2.5 FRM monitor is identical to the PM10 monitor, except for a second impactor for PM2.5 after the impactor for PM10. [![CORRECTillustrative3-peak-pm2.5.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/323/medium/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-pm2.5.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/323/original/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-pm2.5.png) [![CORRECTillustrative3-peak-pm10-25.png](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/324/medium/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-pm10-25.png)](//i.publiclab.org/system/images/photos/000/014/324/original/CORRECTillustrative3-peak-pm10-25.png) Note that neither category directly aligns with the size fraction that can travel into the bronchial region of the lungs, particles of approximately 5 μm. Also note that the FRMs collect particulate matter without determining the composition of that particulate matter, which can vary widely based on location and pollution sources. Inhaled silica is known to be especially damaging to human health, so **silica-specific exposure is [regulated in occupational settings, and in ambient settings in six states](/wiki/silica-monitoring).**...
Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
gretchengehrke | "I'm glad you brought this up, @Ag8n! @Mathew did some work with polarimetry too. See this research note: https://publiclab.org/notes/mathew/05-21-2..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
gretchengehrke | "Thank you so much, @Ag8n! This is exactly what I was hoping to see. I live near Duke University and can see if they have the books there too. Does ..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
amirberAgain | "Do you want to schedule an e-meeting for image analysis as part of this event? " | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
Ag8n | "See below These are photos taken from" the particle atlas", second edition, volume II, by mccrone. " | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
Ag8n | "I checked the images. There are pictures of quartz and several for cristobalite. Didn't see one for tridymite. " | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
Ag8n | "I'm no expert on microscopy. Did mess with it a little. The difference I notice is a lot of the work is done with crossed polars- messing with th..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
gretchengehrke | "We've been trying to use DIY microscopes to distinguish between crystalline and non-crystalline particulate matter. Of course we wouldn't be able t..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
warren | "Wow, would you be able to share an image of "respirable silica"? I'm thinking of how to unpack answers to these questions: https://publiclab.org/q..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
Ag8n | "I do have a copy of edition two, which is four volumes. Volume 1 goes over microscopes, volume 2 gives pictures of the different materials, and vo..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
warren | "This is fantastic - do you have a copy or could we find a copy and share pictures especially of silica particles? " | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
Bronwen | "I just came across a page for this 3D printable smartphone microscope from the Centre for Nanoscale Biophotonics, which seems like an interesting a..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
warren | "That'd be amazing. Thanks so much! " | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
nanocastro | "HI @warren sure I can post the notes on the #shinyei in a different post, maybe as an answer of your question https://publiclab.org/q/15751... We h..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
warren | "@DavidMack posted on sticky pads a while back on the #particle-sensing page: Essentially tape, sticky pads have the advantage of capturing a recor..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
warren | "Also see this great section by @DavidMack -- https://publiclab.org/wiki/particle-sensing#EPA+Test+Methods " | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
warren | "This is such a great post about the #shinyei sensor and its limitations and how best to work with it. We'd love to feature your work with the shiny..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
warren | "Collecting notes on different sensors here! https://publiclab.org/q/15751 " | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
warren | "Moving some text from the #particle-sensing page by @DavidMack -- thanks, David! Trying to consolidate some scattered info on this across the site ..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
warren | "Oh, that plotter looks great! Thanks for sharing! So, there are a lot of people out there teaching each other to make great visualizations in the ..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
cfastie | "I have not used graphing for live debugging because I didn't know how easy it was to do. I use the live serial monitor in the Arduino IDE all the t..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
warren | "Hi, @cfastie - do you think this could be adapted pretty easily for live debugging from a #nano-data-logger or #mini-pearl-logger ? " | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
warren | "I also proposed this p5js sketch as an example for the p5js web editor: https://github.com/processing/p5.js-web-editor/issues/529 " | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
warren | "Hi @Holger -- actually that would be super to see them -- we're particularly interested in the lego one, but any of your microscope projects would ..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago | |||
Holger | "Hi there, my apologies, but I have not been here for a while. If you like, any of my projects published on instructables could be reposted as activ..." | Read more » | almost 7 years ago |