| Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| troyb | "Hi again. I only had limited time to look at the code. I'm not great with Javascript. Two things stood out. First, it is a little odd that the orig..." | Read more » | almost 6 years ago | |||
| troyb | "There are definitely decimal values that don't seem quite right. Thanks for pointing to the code. I'll try to have a look in the next few days. Ap..." | Read more » | almost 6 years ago | |||
| troyb | "Thanks very much for the prompt and numerous replies. I think they add up to an answer. There is a small difference in the intensity of the calibr..." | Read more » | almost 6 years ago | |||
| troyb | "Our spectrometer is pretty amazing. Your comments are right on, I certainly recommend avoiding clipping (the warning in SpectralWorkbench works rea..." | Read more » | almost 6 years ago | |||
| troyb | "So, to clarify: what I'm saying is that there seem to mathematical artefacts in the calibrated intensity values. This means that at least for expor..." | Read more » | almost 6 years ago | |||
| troyb | "Also, I didn't save any spectra with saturated channels that I recall, but the recent spectrum https://spectralworkbench.org/spectrums/137643 illus..." | Read more » | almost 6 years ago | |||
| troyb | "Ah, the table makes the values hard to see. Note for instance that a raw value of 10 scales to 7.65 while a raw values of 23, 24 and 25 scales to 2..." | Read more » | almost 6 years ago |